Home

Price to earnings ratio (P/E ratio) explained

Common stocks of good companies are not necessarily good investments. Investors must compare the intrinsic value of a stock to its market price before buying it. In relative valuation, the value of an asset can be estimated by looking at how the market prices similar or comparable assets. In other words, the value of an asset is the price that the market based on the asset’s characteristics.

Price to Earnings (P/E) ratio is a market value ratio that relates the firm’s stock price to its earnings and provides management with an indication of what investors think of the firm’s past performance and future prospects. Being the most widely used and well-documented ratio of relative valuation, P/E is often referred to as the ‘multiple’ because it indicates how much investors are willing to pay per dollar of a firm’s reported profits.

P/E is calculated by comparing current share price to earnings per share (EPS). For instance, if a share price is currently at $50 and earnings per share over the last 12 months are $1.85 per share, the P/E ratio for the stock is $50/$1.85=27.02.

P/E can be calculated using earnings per share from the last 12 months, which is commonly referred to as trailing P/E. However, it can also be calculated using forecasted earnings per share expected over the next 12 months, which is commonly referred to as forward P/E. A third approach is to use the earnings per share of the last 6 months and expected earnings per share of the next six months. In reality, there isn’t huge difference between these variations. The only thing that investors need to realize is that in trailing P/E they use actual historical data, while the other two calculations are based on estimates that may be wrong or imprecise.

Generally, a high P/E ratio indicates that a firm has a strong growth prospect. A firm with a P/E higher than the market or industry average indicates that investors expect higher earnings in the near future. However, P/E ratio alone is not enough to convey meaning about a firm’s financial strength. For instance, a $20 stock with a P/E 85 is more expensive than an $80 stock with a P/E 30. To determine whether a P/E is high or low, investors should take into consideration the firm’s growth and the industry. Information about how fast the firm has been growing and if its growth rates are expected to increase in the future is important for investors to understand if projected growth rates justify P/E. If they don’t, then a firm’s stock may be overvalued. In relation to industry, P/E is more useful when compared with the P/E ratios of similar companies within the industry. For instance, it doesn’t make investment sense to compare the P/E ratio of a utility firm that typically has a low P/E ratio to the P/E ratio of a technology firm that typically has a high P/E ratio. Each industry is driven by different dynamics and has different growth prospects.

Overall, investors should avoid basing their investment decisions on P/E ratio alone. Although it reflects the market’s optimism in regards a firm’s growth prospects, buy or sell decisions should not be based on the multiple alone as earnings per share are often subject to accounting manipulation.

I work as a financial and investment advisor but my passion is writing, music and photography. Writing mostly about finance, business and music, being an amateur photographer and a professional dj, I am inspired from life.

Being a strong advocate of simplicity in life, I love my family, my partner and all the people that have stood by me with or without knowing. And I hope that someday, human nature will cease to be greedy and demanding realizing that the more we have the more we want and the more we satisfy our needs the more needs we create. And this is so needless after all.

Article Source:http://www.articlesbase.com/investing-articles/price-to-earnings-ratio-pe-ratio-explained-1259346.html

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
Tagged with: , , , , , , ,

Share this:

Read also:


Comments are closed.




47 queries in 17.567 seconds